Making a Dictionary of Key Terms
Aims
Students will develop their understanding of a selected aspect of theatre technology, design or theatre architecture, by creating a dictionary of key terms associated with a significant person. Students will also extend their specialist vocabulary.
Key Information
Number of learners | Groups of two or three students. Multiple groups can do the project at the same time. |
Number of staff | 1 teacher. |
ECTS Credits (if applicable) | 5 ECTS |
Learning process
Lecture/seminar | Lecture, presentation, discussion (face-to-face or online) | |
X | Making project | Making a model, mock-up, plan or design (physical or digital) |
Performance project | Making a performance or demonstration (live or mediated) | |
X | Records and Archives | Interviews, photographs and videos of artefacts, annotating archives, creating learning materials (physical or digital) |
X | Independent study | Reading, researching, analysing and evaluating learning materials (physical or digital) in groups or alone |
Type of learner
X | Student of technical theatre |
X | Student of theatre design, architecture |
X | Student of theatre arts |
X | Professional |
X | Researcher |
X | General public |
What You Will Need
Duration and schedule
Weekly sessions for one semester: two hours for the learners to prepare each week, plus a one hour review with the teacher.
Room or type of space
Classroom.
Equipment
Depending on the format of the dictionary students will create, they may need access to various software platforms.
Materials (consumables)
None.
Learning resources (books, websites)
Books, journals, websites and other sources of information about the selected person (both physical and/or online).
Process
Preparation
Select the person for the case study, and gather information: texts, books, chapters, articles, drawings, and so on.
Prepare a presentation about the selected person.
The learning activity
Introduce students to the selected person, explaining their work and background circumstances: time, historical period, cultural context, and so on.
Each week the students research, read and start to collect the key words that will be in their dictionary. Also, weekly there are sessions with the teachers to supervise, adjust and refine the selection and the definitions made by the students.
At the end of the semester we might expect to have a dictionary with the most important concepts associated with the selected person. Through this process, the student group gets an in-depth knowledge of the historical importance of the selected person and their work, ideas and vision for the theatre.
Assessment and feedback
Students receive feedback throughout the process. The final dictionary can be formally marked if required, and written comments given.
Our Experience
Tips
It is important students dedicate enough time to the research process before starting to write the definitions. They should read fully the resources provided by the teacher and expand their reading with other examples.
Make sure students cover all aspect of the work of the selected person: their technical and creative processes, key concepts and theories, and so on.
Choose the person carefully. You may want to use a particular person to fit into the students’ wider learning, or you might want to use someone that students already have a connection with from previous study, or they have a particular local significance.
You can adapt the way the students develop and express their ideas, according to their skills and areas of interest. As well as written definitions of the terms, students should consider including drawings, diagrams, photographs and videos drawn from the resources they have, or which they make themselves.
You don’t have to make a dictionary about a person. Consider making one about a building, an invention, a theatre company, an artistic movement…
Additional information and resources
Masters students at UPC studying architecture created a dictionary about the work of Jerzy Grotowski (Q30479):
File:IO4 35 Dictionary of Terms Grotowski.pdf
Credits
This learning method was made by: | Antoni Ramon, Guillem Aloy |
Institution: | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona Tech. |